|
|
Post by twcbaseball on Nov 10, 2006 1:46:15 GMT -5
How will Tn stop the Tail Back from Arkansas Sat night on Espn 2. they have two good Tail Backs Maccfaden and I dont know the other one, and After last weeks blow up in the last 1:30 or so left in the game how will our secondary show up from last week giving up 3rd 15's 3rd and LONGSSSSS and of course the winning touch down?
|
|
|
|
Post by ae2 on Nov 10, 2006 1:59:36 GMT -5
We will slow them down, however, Chavis will continue to sit back on 3rd downs and they will convert! If you noticed the Louisville/Rutgers game, Schiano brought alotta people on 3rd downs, what happend? They got stops!
|
|
|
|
Post by peeblee on Nov 10, 2006 9:48:49 GMT -5
the secondary actually graded out quite well...on the winning TD pass one defender failed to cover his assignment and it cost UT the game...according to the players (in interviews) the right defense was called for the particular play that LSU scored on...one defender screwed up and it was all over...
the front seven must get more pressure on teh QB, especially on the blitz packages...when the pressure from blitzes was picked up (blocked) it gave teh receivers more time to get open...thus teh completions on third and long...
|
|
|
|
Post by peeblee on Nov 10, 2006 9:50:09 GMT -5
How will Tn stop the Tail Back from Arkansas Sat night on Espn 2. they have two good Tail Backs Maccfaden and I dont know the other one, and After last weeks blow up in the last 1:30 or so left in the game how will our secondary show up from last week giving up 3rd 15's 3rd and LONGSSSSS and of course the winning touch down? I think teh vols will load up in the box to stop the run and challenge the pigs to throw the football...just my guess!!! |
|
|
|
Post by twcbaseball on Nov 10, 2006 10:00:10 GMT -5
If you didnt know that last pass wasnt evn for the guy that caught it. He stepped infront of it catching it in front of the guy in the back of the endzone atleast thats what Vol Calls was talking about the other night
|
|
|
|
Post by peeblee on Nov 10, 2006 10:08:26 GMT -5
If you didnt know that last pass wasnt evn for the guy that caught it. He stepped infront of it catching it in front of the guy in the back of the endzone atleast thats what Vol Calls was talking about the other night if that was the case (and could quite well have been) then LSU's receivers did a poor job of running their routes to have two guys in teh same area...but I guess poor routes outweighed poor assignment defense...LOL!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Ainge 4 Heisman on Nov 10, 2006 10:33:10 GMT -5
if that was the case (and could quite well have been) then LSU's receivers did a poor job of running their routes to have two guys in teh same area...but I guess poor routes outweighed poor assignment defense...LOL!!! There wasnt just 2 in the same area, there were 3. Id have to say the reason the defense may have gotten confused is because they were tired. You cant put all the blame on the D for the LSU loss. The offense couldnt move the ball when it mattered and keep the D on the sidelines enough for them to get some rest. If you take away the last 2 plays in the final 9 seconds, the offense had a total of 16 plays the entire 2nd half. Im gonna tell you this right now, UT will definitely slow Ark down substantially. Whether they can do it the entire game or not will depend solely on the offenses ability to move the ball. I guarantee you whoever wins the time of pocession battle will win this game. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say 17-10 Vols. Just cuz Im feelin frisky, 24-17 Carolina over the Gators |
|
|
|
Post by peeblee on Nov 10, 2006 10:45:24 GMT -5
if that was the case (and could quite well have been) then LSU's receivers did a poor job of running their routes to have two guys in teh same area...but I guess poor routes outweighed poor assignment defense...LOL!!! There wasnt just 2 in the same area, there were 3. Id have to say the reason the defense may have gotten confused is because they were tired. You cant put all the blame on the D for the LSU loss. The offense couldnt move the ball when it mattered and keep the D on the sidelines enough for them to get some rest. If you take away the last 2 plays in the final 9 seconds, the offense had a total of 16 plays the entire 2nd half. Im gonna tell you this right now, UT will definitely slow Ark down substantially. Whether they can do it the entire game or not will depend solely on the offenses ability to move the ball. I guarantee you whoever wins the time of pocession battle will win this game. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say 17-10 Vols. Just cuz Im feelin frisky, 24-17 Carolina over the Gators the defense was on the field quite a bit...had to be getting tired...good points... carolina over the gators??? that would be a sight to see... cant really say who I might be for in that game... |
|
|
|
Post by Ainge 4 Heisman on Nov 10, 2006 11:33:15 GMT -5
The Arkansas defense likes to play man, that is going to bode well for Swain and Meachem.
|
|
|
|
Post by ae2 on Nov 10, 2006 14:39:46 GMT -5
Tennessee's D was on the foeld to much becouse we couldn't get a stop on 3rd down! This isn't just a problem this yr, we have had problems stopping 3rd downs for quite some time!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ainge 4 Heisman on Nov 10, 2006 14:47:38 GMT -5
Its not really third downs. Its third downs that are long third downs. However, Arkansas is fairly one dimensional. If the Vols can take Monk out of the game, then I believe they can take advantage of starting QB Casey thingy and Chavis will do what he needs to do all the time on 3rd down, bring pressure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ball Coach on Nov 13, 2006 11:54:24 GMT -5
On third down I am either man/press coverage with two deep over the top...or I am getting up field in the QB's face...he can't make good decisions if he is under pressure and having to make quick ones. The TN defense is starting to look like the offense last year...very bland...Idon't know what Chavis problem is, but his seat may be warming up after the last two weeks. If you aren't attacking on defense...especially on 3rd down then the offense is attacking you, and likely converting and scoring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ball Coach on Nov 13, 2006 11:57:41 GMT -5
if that was the case (and could quite well have been) then LSU's receivers did a poor job of running their routes to have two guys in teh same area...but I guess poor routes outweighed poor assignment defense...LOL!!! There wasnt just 2 in the same area, there were 3. Id have to say the reason the defense may have gotten confused is because they were tired. You cant put all the blame on the D for the LSU loss. The offense couldnt move the ball when it mattered and keep the D on the sidelines enough for them to get some rest. If you take away the last 2 plays in the final 9 seconds, the offense had a total of 16 plays the entire 2nd half. Im gonna tell you this right now, UT will definitely slow Ark down substantially. Whether they can do it the entire game or not will depend solely on the offenses ability to move the ball. I guarantee you whoever wins the time of pocession battle will win this game. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say 17-10 Vols. Just cuz Im feelin frisky, 24-17 Carolina over the Gators There were three in the same area because it was a flood patern. When you are that close in a passing situation defenses tend to go zone coverage over the top with some pressure underneath, so one man is covering a specific area on the field...load that area with more than one receiver and you have a flood and the DB has to make a choice of who to cover. |
|
|
|
Post by peeblee on Nov 13, 2006 12:31:07 GMT -5
There wasnt just 2 in the same area, there were 3. Id have to say the reason the defense may have gotten confused is because they were tired. You cant put all the blame on the D for the LSU loss. The offense couldnt move the ball when it mattered and keep the D on the sidelines enough for them to get some rest. If you take away the last 2 plays in the final 9 seconds, the offense had a total of 16 plays the entire 2nd half. Im gonna tell you this right now, UT will definitely slow Ark down substantially. Whether they can do it the entire game or not will depend solely on the offenses ability to move the ball. I guarantee you whoever wins the time of pocession battle will win this game. Im gonna go out on a limb here and say 17-10 Vols. Just cuz Im feelin frisky, 24-17 Carolina over the Gators There were three in the same area because it was a flood patern. When you are that close in a passing situation defenses tend to go zone coverage over the top with some pressure underneath, so one man is covering a specific area on the field...load that area with more than one receiver and you have a flood and the DB has to make a choice of who to cover. that is exactly what a flood pattern is supposed to do... i didnt see the game so I am not sure of the circumstances of the receivers locations... yes in a flood pattern the object is to "flood an area with multiple receivers"....but they arent supposed to be in such tight proximity to make it possible for one defender to "guard" all the receivers at the same time... if the receivers are all within 3 to 5 yards of one another then they are probably too close together...this would enable the DB to break on the ball when thrown and either intercept or bat down the pass... if there is better spacing of the receivers in the "zone" then they are much harder to defend....or if the receivers cross in the zone or enter the zone separately (time spacing) the DB has to make the decision as to which receiver he must defend against... I |
|
|
|
Post by Ball Coach on Nov 13, 2006 20:23:29 GMT -5
I didn't get to see it as I was at a benefit for the hospital up here, but I wouldn't think three WRs would make the same mistake...time spacing is deadly to the zone defense, as is the basic flood...for instance in a cover two with zone under you flood one side or ther other and hopefully a gap is created with the mid/deep wr and the shallow is the dump off wr. enough coachin jargon hahaha.
|
|
